Breaking news for diabetics – this tea will change your life!
Lowers glucose levels the 1st week
CHECK IT OUT @:
http://www.type2solution.com/benefits.php
Dedicated to the physical, mental and emotional health and well being of mankind; with national and international news and views.
Saturday, February 27, 2010
EVIDENCE ON TOXICITY OF MARGARINE
If you doubt the info below, read info at the following links below. For you health nuts, this is important!
Margarine was originally manufactured to fatten turkeys. When it killed the turkeys, the people who had put all the money into the research wanted a payback so they put their heads together to figure out what to do with this product to get their money back. It was a white substance with no food appeal so they added the yellow coloring and sold it to people to use in place of butter. They have also come out with some clever new flavorings. How do you like it?
DO YOU KNOW the difference between margarine and butter?
Both have the same amount of calories.
Butter is slightly higher in saturated fats at 8 grams; compared to 5 grams for margarine.
Butter increases the absorption of many other nutrients in other foods.
Butter has many nutritional benefits where margarine has a few, and only because they are added!
Butter tastes much better than margarine and it can enhance the flavors of other foods.
Butter has been around for centuries where margarine has been around for less than 100 years.
WHAT ABOUT Margarine?
Margarine is very high in Trans fatty acids.
Eating margarine can increase heart disease in women by 53% over eating the same amount of butter, according to a recent Harvard Medical Study. Triples risk of coronary heart disease.
Increases total cholesterol and LDL (this is the bad cholesterol) and lowers HDL cholesterol, (the good cholesterol)
Increases the risk of cancers up to five times.
Lowers quality of breast milk.
Decreases immune response.
Decreases insulin response.
And here's the most disturbing fact.... HERE IS THE PART THAT IS VERY INTERESTING!
Margarine is but ONE MOLECULE away from being PLASTIC... And shares 27 ingredients with PAINT
These facts alone were enough to have me avoiding margarine for life and anything else that is hydrogenated (this means hydrogen is added, changing the molecular structure of the substance).
Try this yourself:
Purchase a tub of margarine and leave it open in your garage or shaded area. Within a couple of days you will notice a couple of things:
* no flies, not even those pesky fruit flies will go near it (that should tell you something)
* it does not rot or smell differently because it has no nutritional value; nothing will grow on it. Even those teeny weeny microorganisms will not a find a home to grow. Why? Because it is nearly plastic. Would you melt your Tupperware and spread that on your toast?
Share This With Your Friends.....(If you want to butter them up')!
HOW MARGARINE IS MADE:
http://www.stop-trans-fat.com/how-is-margarine-made.html
BUTTER v MARGARINE DEBATE:
http://www.stop-trans-fat.com/butter-v-margarine.html
If you doubt the info below, read info at the following links below. For you health nuts, this is important!
Margarine was originally manufactured to fatten turkeys. When it killed the turkeys, the people who had put all the money into the research wanted a payback so they put their heads together to figure out what to do with this product to get their money back. It was a white substance with no food appeal so they added the yellow coloring and sold it to people to use in place of butter. They have also come out with some clever new flavorings. How do you like it?DO YOU KNOW the difference between margarine and butter?
Both have the same amount of calories.
Butter is slightly higher in saturated fats at 8 grams; compared to 5 grams for margarine.
Butter increases the absorption of many other nutrients in other foods.
Butter has many nutritional benefits where margarine has a few, and only because they are added!
Butter tastes much better than margarine and it can enhance the flavors of other foods.
Butter has been around for centuries where margarine has been around for less than 100 years.
WHAT ABOUT Margarine?
Margarine is very high in Trans fatty acids.
Eating margarine can increase heart disease in women by 53% over eating the same amount of butter, according to a recent Harvard Medical Study. Triples risk of coronary heart disease.
Increases total cholesterol and LDL (this is the bad cholesterol) and lowers HDL cholesterol, (the good cholesterol)
Increases the risk of cancers up to five times.
Lowers quality of breast milk.
Decreases immune response.
Decreases insulin response.
And here's the most disturbing fact.... HERE IS THE PART THAT IS VERY INTERESTING!
Margarine is but ONE MOLECULE away from being PLASTIC... And shares 27 ingredients with PAINT
These facts alone were enough to have me avoiding margarine for life and anything else that is hydrogenated (this means hydrogen is added, changing the molecular structure of the substance).
Try this yourself:
Purchase a tub of margarine and leave it open in your garage or shaded area. Within a couple of days you will notice a couple of things:
* no flies, not even those pesky fruit flies will go near it (that should tell you something)
* it does not rot or smell differently because it has no nutritional value; nothing will grow on it. Even those teeny weeny microorganisms will not a find a home to grow. Why? Because it is nearly plastic. Would you melt your Tupperware and spread that on your toast?
Share This With Your Friends.....(If you want to butter them up')!
HOW MARGARINE IS MADE:
http://www.stop-trans-fat.com/how-is-margarine-made.html
BUTTER v MARGARINE DEBATE:
http://www.stop-trans-fat.com/butter-v-margarine.html
Tuesday, February 16, 2010
WINDOW CLEANING CHEMICAL INJECTED into fast food hamburger meat
January 05, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com
DIGEST THE REST OF IT HERE:
http://farmwars.info/?p=2190#more-2190
January 05, 2010
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger
Editor of NaturalNews.com
If you’re in the
beef business, what do you do with all the extra cow parts and trimmings that have traditionally been sold off for use in pet food? You scrape them together into a pink mass, inject them with a chemical to kill the e.coli, and sell them to fast food restaurants to make into hamburgers.
That’s what’s been happening all across the USA with beef sold to McDonald’s, Burger King, school lunches and other fast food restaurants, according to a New York Times article. The beef is injected with ammonia, a chemical commonly used in glass cleaning and window cleaning products.
This is all fine with the USDA, which endorses the procedure as a way to make the hamburger beef “safe” enough to eat. Ammonia kills e.coli, you see, and the USDA doesn’t seem to be concerned with the fact that people are eating ammonia in their hamburgers.
This ammonia-injected beef comes from a company called Beef Products, Inc. As NYT reports, the federal school lunch program used a whopping 5.5 million pounds of ammonia-injected beef trimmings from this company in 2008. This company reportedly developed the idea of using ammonia to sterilize beef before selling it for human consumption.
Aside from the fact that there’s ammonia in the hamburger meat, there’s another problem with this company’s products: The ammonia doesn’t always kill the pathogens. Both e.coli and salmonella have been found contaminating the cow-derived products sold by this company.
beef business, what do you do with all the extra cow parts and trimmings that have traditionally been sold off for use in pet food? You scrape them together into a pink mass, inject them with a chemical to kill the e.coli, and sell them to fast food restaurants to make into hamburgers.That’s what’s been happening all across the USA with beef sold to McDonald’s, Burger King, school lunches and other fast food restaurants, according to a New York Times article. The beef is injected with ammonia, a chemical commonly used in glass cleaning and window cleaning products.
This is all fine with the USDA, which endorses the procedure as a way to make the hamburger beef “safe” enough to eat. Ammonia kills e.coli, you see, and the USDA doesn’t seem to be concerned with the fact that people are eating ammonia in their hamburgers.
This ammonia-injected beef comes from a company called Beef Products, Inc. As NYT reports, the federal school lunch program used a whopping 5.5 million pounds of ammonia-injected beef trimmings from this company in 2008. This company reportedly developed the idea of using ammonia to sterilize beef before selling it for human consumption.
Aside from the fact that there’s ammonia in the hamburger meat, there’s another problem with this company’s products: The ammonia doesn’t always kill the pathogens. Both e.coli and salmonella have been found contaminating the cow-derived products sold by this company.
DIGEST THE REST OF IT HERE:
http://farmwars.info/?p=2190#more-2190
Monday, February 8, 2010
HIGH CAFFEINE INTAKE LINKED TO Hallucination Proneness
High caffeine
consumption could be linked to a greater tendency to hallucinate, a new research study suggests. People with a higher caffeine intake, from sources such as coffee, tea and caffeinated energy drinks, are more likely to report hallucinatory experiences such as hearing voices and seeing things that are not there, according to the Durham University study.
“High caffeine users” - those who consumed more than the equivalent of seven cups of instant coffee a day - were three times more likely to have heard a person's voice when there was no one there compared with “low caffeine users” who consumed less than the equivalent of one cup of instant coffee a day.
http://www.sciencecentric.com/news/article.php?q=09011449-high-caffeine-intake-linked-hallucination-proneness
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/01/090114-caffeine-hallucinations.html
One of the
problems with caffeine today is that most people have no idea how much caffeine they consume daily. More and more beverage, food and pharmaceutical products have higher and higher amounts of caffeine as an ingredient – even chewing gum! With caffeine everywhere, it's not that hard to become caffeine-intoxicated. Starbucks coffee has 50 percent more caffeine than home brew and just one 16-ounce cup of Starbucks drip coffee has 330 milligrams of caffeine -- the amount that can cause hallucinations according to the Durham University researchers.
Ethic Soup blog has an excellent article on Caffeine Facts at:
http://www.ethicsoup.com/abcs-of-caffeine.html
High caffeine
consumption could be linked to a greater tendency to hallucinate, a new research study suggests. People with a higher caffeine intake, from sources such as coffee, tea and caffeinated energy drinks, are more likely to report hallucinatory experiences such as hearing voices and seeing things that are not there, according to the Durham University study. “High caffeine users” - those who consumed more than the equivalent of seven cups of instant coffee a day - were three times more likely to have heard a person's voice when there was no one there compared with “low caffeine users” who consumed less than the equivalent of one cup of instant coffee a day.
http://www.sciencecentric.com/news/article.php?q=09011449-high-caffeine-intake-linked-hallucination-proneness
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2009/01/090114-caffeine-hallucinations.html
ALSO READ
Caffeine or "That Old Black Magic"
http://www.usnews.com/news/national/articles/2009/01/16/health-hot-docs-can-caffeine-cause-hallucinations-a-rise-in-sexually-transmitted-diseases/comments/One of the
problems with caffeine today is that most people have no idea how much caffeine they consume daily. More and more beverage, food and pharmaceutical products have higher and higher amounts of caffeine as an ingredient – even chewing gum! With caffeine everywhere, it's not that hard to become caffeine-intoxicated. Starbucks coffee has 50 percent more caffeine than home brew and just one 16-ounce cup of Starbucks drip coffee has 330 milligrams of caffeine -- the amount that can cause hallucinations according to the Durham University researchers.Ethic Soup blog has an excellent article on Caffeine Facts at:
http://www.ethicsoup.com/abcs-of-caffeine.html
THIS RACEHORSE
Gets Better Pain Care Than You!
His secret can put you back in the running better than any pill on earth!
Our story
starts with an outrageous fact about modern healthcare. When it comes to natural pain relief, the average American racehorse may get better treatment than you and your loved ones. Why? Because racehorses don't win when they're hurting – and racing regulations forbid 'doping' with drugs like cortisone. As a result, great trainers are always looking for truly effective natural remedies. And their most valuable secret of all may be .... DMSO
starts with an outrageous fact about modern healthcare. When it comes to natural pain relief, the average American racehorse may get better treatment than you and your loved ones. Why? Because racehorses don't win when they're hurting – and racing regulations forbid 'doping' with drugs like cortisone. As a result, great trainers are always looking for truly effective natural remedies. And their most valuable secret of all may be .... DMSODMSO — An Underground Legend
LEARN MORE ABOUT THE AMAZING DMSO:
https://web-purchases.com/650SPDP/WHSIK7A1/landing.html?
U.S. AUTISM CASES UP 59%
By Stacey Singer
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
By Stacey Singer
Palm Beach Post Staff Writer
One in every
100 children in the United States may have some form of autism spectrum disorder, far more than previously believed, and the rate appears to be worsening quickly, especially among boys, new figures from the CDC show.The 2000 data had suggested one in 150 children were affected.
It was a stunning run-up of 59 percent in four years, and the increase COULD NOT BE EXPLAINED just by better awareness or an expanded diagnosis, researchers found.
See the article here:
http://www.palmbeachpost.com/health/u-s-autism-cases-show-59-increase-alarming-133085.html
The gigantic increase in autism cannot be explained because the medical profession refuses to acknowledge all the facts. Check out the following:
THE THIMEROSAL CONSPIRACY
by Josh Day
Robert Kennedy, Jr. has written a chilling expose that details the latest outrages in the ongoing thimerosal and vaccine story. Though the facts are stunning, it is not at all surprising, given the government and Big Pharm's track record when it comes to injecting children with thimerosal.
Apparently, the government has known about thimerosal dangers for some time and has continued vaccinating infants and children with mercury, understanding full well the link to autism and other disorders.
In a chilling Wannsee conference-style meeting, top brass in the pharmaceutical empire, FDA and CDC lackeys, and their scientist dogs have concocted their own Final Solution in "handling" the thimerosal problem.
These men met and decided to cover up a study that proved a connection between thimerosal and autism, as well as other serious disorders.
GET THE WHOLE STORY:
http://chetday.com/autismthimerosal.htm
If You Don’t Believe It Check These Out:
Autism linked to Inoculations
http://cv.11.forumer.com/a/autism-linked-to-innoculations_post77.html
The Vaccine and Autism Debate -- Parents Wonder if the MMR Innoculation Could Have Caused Autism.
http://autismaspergerssyndrome.suite101.com/article.cfm/the_vaccine_and_autism_debate
AMERICAN DIET MOVING AWAY FROM Omega-3 Fatty Acids
Personal Liberty Articles
by Bob Livingston
The ratio
of omega-3 fats to omega-6 fats has been moving in favor of omega-6s for years in the American diet. My reading tells me that this imbalance of the omega-3s and omega-6s is dominant in the American diet, leading to general and specific deterioration in American health. Domination of omega-6s appears to be specific to inflammation, and inflammation seems to be associated with serious health problems including heart disease and cancer.
GET MORE OF THIS HEALTHY STORY HERE:
http://www.personalliberty.com/health-concerns/american-diet-moving-steadily-away-from-omega-3-fatty-acids/
Personal Liberty Articles
by Bob Livingston
The ratio
of omega-3 fats to omega-6 fats has been moving in favor of omega-6s for years in the American diet. My reading tells me that this imbalance of the omega-3s and omega-6s is dominant in the American diet, leading to general and specific deterioration in American health. Domination of omega-6s appears to be specific to inflammation, and inflammation seems to be associated with serious health problems including heart disease and cancer.GET MORE OF THIS HEALTHY STORY HERE:
http://www.personalliberty.com/health-concerns/american-diet-moving-steadily-away-from-omega-3-fatty-acids/
BRAIN TUMORS DON’T LIE!
By
Ben Jorgensen, Editor
The Clearwater Progress
December 24, 2002
Graphics added by blog host
Talking too much on a cell phone could make you sick. But just as with the history of cigarettes, there are plenty who deny any health dangers associated with cell phones.
Meanwhile, the cancers are starting to add up.
More and more studies are linking cell phone use to a host of cancers, behavioral issues and other disorders. The issue hit national headlines last weekend when the state of Maine began mulling a decision to put health warnings on new cell phones.
If passed, the bill would require phone manufacturers to warn customers about the potential for developing brain cancer that is associated with electromagnetic radiation emitted from cell phones.
More than 270 million people subscribed to cell service in the United States last year, according to a report by the Associated Press.
The health danger is especially real for children, said Professor Kjell Mild of Orbero University, Sweden, who says a child’s thinner skull is deeply penetrated by a cell phone’s energy.
Electromagnetic radiation from a cell phone can penetrate almost straight through the brain of a 5-year-old child. The impacts may also affect child behavior.
In 2008 the UCLA School of Public Health announced a possible link between cell phone exposure and behavioral problems in young children. A study conducted with University of Aarhus, Institute of Public Health in Denmark, found: “Children who were exposed to cell phones before and/or after birth tended to have higher prevalence of emotional symptoms, behavioral problems, inattention, hyperactivity and problems with peers…”
According to EMF & Health: A Global Issue, research indicates that children and teenagers are five times more likely to develop brain cancer if they use cell phones.
Professor Lennart Hardell of Sweden stated that, “people who started mobile phone use before the age of 20” had more than fivefold increase in glioma, a cancer of the glial cells that support the central nervous system.
Cordless phones are not much better, producing a fourfold risk of cancer among children.
While children are more susceptible to the energy emitted from cell phones, adults are by no means immune.
A $28 million research project funded by the Cellular Telephone Industry Association (CTIA)keep in mind that this is an industry-sponsored studyproduced surprising (to them) results:
A nearly 300 percent increase in the incidence of genetic damage when human blood cells were exposed to radiation in the cellular frequency band.
A significant increase in cell phone users’ risk of brain tumors at the brain’s outer edge, on whichever side the cell phone was held most often.
A 60 percent greater chance of acoustic neuromas, a tumor affecting the nerve that controls hearing, among people who had used cell phones for six years or more.
A higher rate of brain cancer deaths among handheld mobile phone users than among car phone users (car phones are mounted on the dashboard rather than held next to your head).
Despite such findings,
CTIA was quoted in an AP article last weekend that, “The peer-reviewed scientific evidence has overwhelmingly indicated that wireless devices do not pose a public health risk.”
Really?
Perhaps they never read the 2007 BioInitiative Report. The 600+ page report documents scientific concerns about the current safety regulations on how much radiation is allowable from power lines, cell phones, and many other sources of exposure to radio frequencies and electromagnetic fields.
The report details that even low energy levels can create severe health repercussions.
The report is the product of an international group of scientists, researchers and public health policy professionals who reviewed over 2,000 studies on the known biological effects of electromagnetic radiation and its impacts on the immune function, the neurological system, and much more at substantially lower levels than current FCC exposure guidelines allow for industry.
The group concluded that the existing standards for public safety do not come close to protecting our health. “For emissions from wireless devices (cell phones, personal digital assistant or PDA devices, etc.) there is enough evidence for increased risk of brain tumors and acoustic neuromas now to warrant intervention with respect to their use.”
It is known that 20-80% of a cell phone’s radiation is deposited into the head of the user. Researchers have discovered that animals exposed to cell phone radiation suffered double-strand DNA breakage – the type of genetic alterations that can lead to cancer, cell death and mutagenic problems.
Many people may believe cell phones are safe because there does not appear to be any immediate noticeable effects to their health. But scientists note that many of the cancers linked to cell phone use can take 10-30 years to develop.
Tumor immunologist Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI), has publicly spoken out about the dangers of cell phones, urging immediate action be taken to protect lives.
“Really at the heart
of my concern is that we shouldn’t wait for a definitive study to come out, but err on the side of being safe rather than sorry later,” Herberman said.
Iowa senator Tom Harkin, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, vowed to investigate links between cell phone use and cancer.
“I’m reminded of this nation’s experience with cigarettes,” Harkin said. “Decades passed between the first warnings about smoking tobacco and the final definitive conclusion that cigarettes cause lung cancer.”
While America debates the science other nations have been attempting to protect their constituents’ health. In regard to cell phone use the U.K., Belgium, Germany, France and Russia have introduced precautionary standards.
As the BioIntitiative Report concludes: “We cannot afford ‘business as usual’ any longer. It is time that planning for new power lines and for new homes, schools and other habitable spaces around them is done with routine provision for low-ELF environments.”
That was two years ago when there were millions fewer cell phones and far less saturation of EMF radiation in homes, schools and businesses. As many researchers have discovered, exposure to EMF radiation can be cumulative.
READ MORE ABOUT CELL PHONES AND RISK OF CANCER:
Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer Risk
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones
Maine to consider cell phone cancer warning
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34502456/ns/health-cancer/
Cell Phones Cause Cancer, Says World Health Organization
http://www.switched.com/2009/10/27/cell-phones-cause-cancer-says-world-health-organization/
Ben Jorgensen, EditorThe Clearwater Progress
December 24, 2002
Graphics added by blog host
Talking too much on a cell phone could make you sick. But just as with the history of cigarettes, there are plenty who deny any health dangers associated with cell phones.
Meanwhile, the cancers are starting to add up.
More and more studies are linking cell phone use to a host of cancers, behavioral issues and other disorders. The issue hit national headlines last weekend when the state of Maine began mulling a decision to put health warnings on new cell phones.
If passed, the bill would require phone manufacturers to warn customers about the potential for developing brain cancer that is associated with electromagnetic radiation emitted from cell phones.
More than 270 million people subscribed to cell service in the United States last year, according to a report by the Associated Press.
The health danger is especially real for children, said Professor Kjell Mild of Orbero University, Sweden, who says a child’s thinner skull is deeply penetrated by a cell phone’s energy.
Electromagnetic radiation from a cell phone can penetrate almost straight through the brain of a 5-year-old child. The impacts may also affect child behavior.
In 2008 the UCLA School of Public Health announced a possible link between cell phone exposure and behavioral problems in young children. A study conducted with University of Aarhus, Institute of Public Health in Denmark, found: “Children who were exposed to cell phones before and/or after birth tended to have higher prevalence of emotional symptoms, behavioral problems, inattention, hyperactivity and problems with peers…”
According to EMF & Health: A Global Issue, research indicates that children and teenagers are five times more likely to develop brain cancer if they use cell phones.Professor Lennart Hardell of Sweden stated that, “people who started mobile phone use before the age of 20” had more than fivefold increase in glioma, a cancer of the glial cells that support the central nervous system.
Cordless phones are not much better, producing a fourfold risk of cancer among children.
While children are more susceptible to the energy emitted from cell phones, adults are by no means immune.
A $28 million research project funded by the Cellular Telephone Industry Association (CTIA)keep in mind that this is an industry-sponsored studyproduced surprising (to them) results:
A nearly 300 percent increase in the incidence of genetic damage when human blood cells were exposed to radiation in the cellular frequency band.
A significant increase in cell phone users’ risk of brain tumors at the brain’s outer edge, on whichever side the cell phone was held most often.
A 60 percent greater chance of acoustic neuromas, a tumor affecting the nerve that controls hearing, among people who had used cell phones for six years or more.
A higher rate of brain cancer deaths among handheld mobile phone users than among car phone users (car phones are mounted on the dashboard rather than held next to your head).
Despite such findings,
CTIA was quoted in an AP article last weekend that, “The peer-reviewed scientific evidence has overwhelmingly indicated that wireless devices do not pose a public health risk.”Really?
Perhaps they never read the 2007 BioInitiative Report. The 600+ page report documents scientific concerns about the current safety regulations on how much radiation is allowable from power lines, cell phones, and many other sources of exposure to radio frequencies and electromagnetic fields.
The report details that even low energy levels can create severe health repercussions.
The report is the product of an international group of scientists, researchers and public health policy professionals who reviewed over 2,000 studies on the known biological effects of electromagnetic radiation and its impacts on the immune function, the neurological system, and much more at substantially lower levels than current FCC exposure guidelines allow for industry.
The group concluded that the existing standards for public safety do not come close to protecting our health. “For emissions from wireless devices (cell phones, personal digital assistant or PDA devices, etc.) there is enough evidence for increased risk of brain tumors and acoustic neuromas now to warrant intervention with respect to their use.”
It is known that 20-80% of a cell phone’s radiation is deposited into the head of the user. Researchers have discovered that animals exposed to cell phone radiation suffered double-strand DNA breakage – the type of genetic alterations that can lead to cancer, cell death and mutagenic problems.
Many people may believe cell phones are safe because there does not appear to be any immediate noticeable effects to their health. But scientists note that many of the cancers linked to cell phone use can take 10-30 years to develop.
Tumor immunologist Dr. Ronald B. Herberman, director of the University of Pittsburgh Cancer Institute (UPCI), has publicly spoken out about the dangers of cell phones, urging immediate action be taken to protect lives.
“Really at the heart
of my concern is that we shouldn’t wait for a definitive study to come out, but err on the side of being safe rather than sorry later,” Herberman said.Iowa senator Tom Harkin, chairman of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee, vowed to investigate links between cell phone use and cancer.
“I’m reminded of this nation’s experience with cigarettes,” Harkin said. “Decades passed between the first warnings about smoking tobacco and the final definitive conclusion that cigarettes cause lung cancer.”
While America debates the science other nations have been attempting to protect their constituents’ health. In regard to cell phone use the U.K., Belgium, Germany, France and Russia have introduced precautionary standards.
As the BioIntitiative Report concludes: “We cannot afford ‘business as usual’ any longer. It is time that planning for new power lines and for new homes, schools and other habitable spaces around them is done with routine provision for low-ELF environments.”
That was two years ago when there were millions fewer cell phones and far less saturation of EMF radiation in homes, schools and businesses. As many researchers have discovered, exposure to EMF radiation can be cumulative.
How many brain cancers will it take to change minds?
READ MORE ABOUT CELL PHONES AND RISK OF CANCER:
Cellular Telephone Use and Cancer Risk
http://www.cancer.gov/cancertopics/factsheet/Risk/cellphones
Maine to consider cell phone cancer warning
http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/34502456/ns/health-cancer/
Cell Phones Cause Cancer, Says World Health Organization
http://www.switched.com/2009/10/27/cell-phones-cause-cancer-says-world-health-organization/
FINALLY -- the breakthrough that releases the soft, cushioning secret hiding inside your joints!
For nine long
years, scientists have known about a secret that can help your joints glide along as smooth as silk on silk. This cushioning discovery is locked inside your joints, but there's never been a practical way to release it -- UNTIL NOW.
Discover the NEW breakthrough that leaps over every challenge and helps you bend, crouch and stretch with confidence. Release the smooth secret hidden in your joints today!
Keep Reading
years, scientists have known about a secret that can help your joints glide along as smooth as silk on silk. This cushioning discovery is locked inside your joints, but there's never been a practical way to release it -- UNTIL NOW.Discover the NEW breakthrough that leaps over every challenge and helps you bend, crouch and stretch with confidence. Release the smooth secret hidden in your joints today!
TOPICAL PAIN DRUG CAN KILL YOUR LIVER!
Think topical painkillers are safer than pills? They're not.
The FDA
just announced that dicoflenac gel (brand name Voltaren Gel) -- often prescribed for arthritis pain -- is linked to severe liver damage... and it can happen within the first month of use!
According to the FDA, this topical gel has been reported to cause liver necrosis (death of liver cells), jaundice, and liver failure... some cases of which have required liver transplant... and some that have been fatal!
Of course, despite these horrible side effects, dicoflenac gel remains very much on the market.
But you don't have to risk your life to erase arthritis pain. Check out the HSI cures library where you'll find dozens of safe, natural alternatives to liver-killing pharmaceuticals.
just announced that dicoflenac gel (brand name Voltaren Gel) -- often prescribed for arthritis pain -- is linked to severe liver damage... and it can happen within the first month of use! According to the FDA, this topical gel has been reported to cause liver necrosis (death of liver cells), jaundice, and liver failure... some cases of which have required liver transplant... and some that have been fatal!
Of course, despite these horrible side effects, dicoflenac gel remains very much on the market.
But you don't have to risk your life to erase arthritis pain. Check out the HSI cures library where you'll find dozens of safe, natural alternatives to liver-killing pharmaceuticals.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)